Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Financial Source ReportFinancial Source Report

Editor's Pick

Corporate Welfare and Low-Income Welfare

Chris Edwards

I testified yesterday at a House hearing focused on low-income welfare programs, including housing and food programs. The Trump administration and congressional Republicans are proposing to cut some of these programs.

Such cuts were opposed by Democratic members at the hearing, and ranking member Raja Krishnamoorthi (D‑IL) argued that the GOP is more eager to cut low-income welfare than corporate welfare. On a large foam board, he highlighted my Cato study, which found $181 billion in corporate welfare in the federal budget.

s

Krishnamoorthi’s point was a good one, and I responded that I favored cutting both corporate welfare and low-income welfare. Both types of welfare create dependency, and both usually create outcomes worse than what is promised.

Furthermore, both types of welfare are less effective at solving problems than market-based solutions. My testimony discussed numerous market-based ways of tackling the housing affordability crisis.

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

When markets get more volatile and more unstable, I get the urge to take a step back and reflect on simple assessments of trend...

Editor's Pick

Jeffrey A. Singer Below is an excerpt of the new book Your Body, Your Health Care (Cato Institute 2025) by Jeffrey A. Singer, MD,...

Editor's Pick

One of my favorite market breadth indicators remained in an extreme bearish reading through the end of last week, standing in stark contrast to...

Editor's Pick

Walter Olson No civil rights law on the books requires “viewpoint diversity” in university admissions or hiring or creates a protected class of students...